|
| 中国学者近十年在国际四大医学期刊的载文特征分析 |
| China's contribution to scientific publications in four leading general medical journals between 2009 and 2018Guo Rui, Chen Xin, Zhang Yuan, Song Guoying, Liu Xuesong, Zhou Yang, Chen Xinshi |
| 投稿时间：2019-08-06 修订日期：2019-08-26 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 医学期刊 中国 科研论文 影响力 |
| 英文关键词: Medical journal China Research articles Impact |
| 基金项目:中文科技期刊精品建设计划项目（2018KJQK005）；中国科协精品科技期刊工程-学术质量提升项目（Ⅳ-XSZL-111） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 261 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 了解中国学者(除我国台湾地区)近10年在四大著名医学期刊的载文量、被引情况及文章分布特征。方法 以ISI Web of Science数据资源平台为检索源,检索中国学者2009至2018年在《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEJM)、《柳叶刀》(Lancet)、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)、《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)发表的文章,纳入研究论文(Aritcle)、述评类文章(Editorial Material)、综述(Review)、通信类文章(Letter)四种文章类型。分析中国学者在四大医学期刊的总体载文特征及中国学者以第一作者身份发表文章的特征。 结果 近10年中国学者在四大医学期刊发表文章1357篇；其中以第一作者身份发表文章850篇,文章数量总体呈平稳上升趋势,由2009年的72篇上升至2018年的97篇。850篇文章中,Article 131篇,占15.4%；Editorial material 210篇,占24.7%；Review 22篇,占2.6%；Letter 487篇,占57.3%。发文数量前3的地区为分别为北京(224篇)、香港(133篇)、上海(101篇)。发文量前3的机构分别为香港中文大学(64篇)、北京协和医学院/中国医学科学院(54篇)、北京大学(50篇)。有基金项目资助的文章中,获得国家自然科学基金资助的文章占比最高,为24.7%(44/178)。与中国研究合作较多的国家为美国、英国、澳大利亚、加拿大、日本。 结论 近10年中国学者在四大医学期刊发文量持续平稳增长,但总量不多,Article占比不高,科研基金支持力度和研究合作程度有待进一步加强。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the frequencies, citations and distribution characteristics of publications published by Chinese scholars in four leading general medical journals during last decade. Methods The Thomson-Reuter’s Web of Science (WoS) database was searched to retrieve publications published by Chinese scholars in NEJM, Lancet, JAMA and BMJ, and document type was set to Article, Editorial Material, Review and Letter between 2009 and 2018. The frequencies and characteristics of total and first author publications were analyzed. Results A total of 1357 publications were identified, among which first author publications accounted for 62.64% (850/1357). Overall trends presented fluctuating growth from 72 publications in 2009 to 97 in 2018. Among these 850 publications, Article, Editorial Material, Review and Letter accounts for 15.4% (131), 24.7 (210), 2.6% (22) and 57.3% (487), respectively. The three most productive regions included Beijing (224), Hong Kong (133) and Shanghai (101). The three most productive institutions were the Chinese University of Hong Kong (64), Peking Union Medical College / Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (54) and Peking University (50). In terms of publications supported by funds, the most common fund was National Natural Science Foundation of China, which accounted for 24.7% (44/178). China had a close cooperation with the USA, UK, Australia, Canada and Japan. Conclusions Currently available study demonstrated that publications published by Chinese scholars in four leading general medical journals had a stable growth during last decade. However, the total amount of publications and Articles were still low. For future work, the frequency and strength should be potentiated on the research fund and cooperation. |
|
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|