文章摘要
基于上海高校医学期刊的统计图表应用现况及质量评价研究
Study on the status quo and quality evaluation of data graphs and tables based on academic medical journals in Shanghai universities
投稿时间:2018-12-12  修订日期:2019-01-20
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2019.05.006
中文关键词: 统计图表  期刊论文  质量评价
英文关键词: Data graphs and tables  Journal article  Quality assessment
基金项目:2017年同济大学第十二期实验教学改革专项基金项目(1500104162);2018年同济大学第11期精品实验项目(1500104180)
作者单位E-mail
唐玉洪 同济大学医学院卫生统计教研室  
郑嘉祺 同济大学医学院卫生统计教研室  
王焕 同济大学医学院卫生统计教研室  
艾自胜 同济大学医学院卫生统计教研室 azs1966@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 664
中文摘要:
      目的 评价医学论著中统计图表的应用状况以及质量。方法 采用分层随机抽样的方法 ,对论著基本信息、图表应用现况、图表质量和图的类型进行统计分析。结果 含有图表的论著以小样本研究为主,SPSS是使用最多的软件。统计图表使用率为48.40%,临床类论著图表使用率最高(60.11%)。统计表总体使用率为45.5%,2011—2015年统计表数量和含有统计表的论著数量均有下降趋势(P=0.034)。统计表正确率为25.09%,缺陷主要集中在同指标小数位数不一致和数值数据没有右对齐的问题。统计图总体使用率较低(12%),统计图中带区间的直条图使用率最高(33.14%)。统计图正确率为57.7%,在视觉清晰度和特殊标准上存在较大缺陷。结论 医学论著结果 呈现依然以统计表为主,统计图质量高于统计表。
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the quantity and quality of graphs and tables in medical literature. Methods We conducted a retrospective survey of 750 randomly selected original research articles, from 2011 2015 issues of 5 academic medical journals by using a stratified random sampling method. Paper characteristics, application status, quantity and quality of graphs and tables were analyzed. Results More than 48% of original research articles contained at least 1 table or graph. The highest frequency of using table and graph was in clinical research. The number of tables and the number of articles with tables were both significantly decreased during 2011 2015 (P=0.034). The most common errors in tables were the inconsistent decimal number and the presentation of numeric data without right alignment. Only 12% of the articles contained at least 1 graph. Of the 175 graphs, bar chart with intervals predominated. Compared with other domains, the completeness of graphs was excellence.Conclusions The result expression in medical research is still dominated by tables. And the quality of graphs is much better than tables.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器