文章摘要
中国医学学科区域科研竞争力分析
Analysis of regional research competitiveness of medical subjects in China
投稿时间:2018-10-29  修订日期:2018-11-30
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2019.05.011
中文关键词: 医学学科  科研竞争力  国家自然科学基金
英文关键词: Medical subjects  Research competitiveness  NFSC
基金项目:基金项目:北京大学医学部教育教学研究资助课题(J0332 6602 22002/22001)
作者单位E-mail
廖鹏 北京大学公共卫生学院  
乔冠华 北京大学公共卫生学院 15101120876@126.com 
贾金忠 北京大学研究生院医学部分院全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会秘书处办公室学公共卫生学院  
王志锋 北京大学公共卫生学院  
摘要点击次数: 675
中文摘要:
      目的 分析中国医学学科区域科研竞争力现状。方法 根据2017年国家自然科学基金的资助状况,利用极差率和泰尔指数贡献率探讨资助的离散度及差异来源,从区域对国家自然科学基金的集聚角度来衡量医学学科科研竞争力。结果 华东和华南地区的医学学科科研竞争力较强,西北地区的医学学科科研竞争力较弱。医学基金的分布差异主要源于区域内部(88.88%),其中华东和华北地区是差异贡献率最大的2个区域。分省看,上海和北京对医学基金的集聚能力远高于其它省份。结论 我国区域间医学学科科研竞争力差异较大,且差异主要源于内部各省的竞争;不同区域内医学学科的优势程度不一,且各区域均存在医学科研中心。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the current status of research competitiveness of medical subjects in China. Methods Analyzing the fund of Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) in 2017 and using the Range ratio and Theil Index to describe the dispersion and source of difference. Regional research competitiveness of Chinese medical subjects is measured by the attraction and accumulation capacity of NSFC. Results The research competitiveness of medical subjects in East China and South China are stronger, and those in the Northwest are weaker. The distribution of medical funds mainly originated from the interior (88.88%), among which the East China and North China are the two regions with the largest contribution rate. In terms of provinces, Shanghai and Beijing have a much higher concentration of medical funds than other provinces.Conclusions The Research competitiveness in inter regional medical subjects in China is quite different, and the differences mainly stem from the competition of internal provinces; the degree of advantages of medical subjects in regions is different, and there are medical research centers in ever regions.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器